Dermapen 4 vs Rejuran: What’s the Difference—and Which Is Right for Your Skin?
- Apr 22
- 2 min read

In the world of regenerative aesthetics, two of the most talked-about treatments are microneedling with Dermapen 4 and Rejuran (polynucleotide injections).
Both aim to improve skin quality, boost collagen, and restore a youthful appearance—but they work in completely different ways.
Understanding this difference is key to choosing the right treatment—and achieving the best results.
What is Dermapen 4 Microneedling?
Microneedling—also known as collagen induction therapy—uses a device like Dermapen 4 to create thousands of controlled micro-injuries in the skin.
These micro-channels trigger your body’s natural healing response, leading to:
increased collagen production
improved skin texture
smoother, more even skin
The channels also allow active ingredients to penetrate more effectively, enhancing results.
In simple terms: Microneedling stimulates your skin to repair itself.
What is Rejuran?
Rejuran is an injectable treatment made from polynucleotides (PN)—highly purified DNA fragments derived from salmon.
These molecules act as biological signals that:
stimulate fibroblasts
promote tissue repair
improve skin elasticity and hydration
Rather than triggering repair through injury, Rejuran works by directly supporting regeneration at a cellular level.
In simple terms: Rejuran helps rebuild and repair your skin from within.
The Core Difference: Mechanical vs Biological
This is the most important distinction.
Dermapen 4 Microneedling | Rejuran | |
Type | Mechanical stimulation | Injectable regenerative treatment |
How it works | Creates micro-injury → healing response | Delivers polynucleotides → cellular repair |
Target | Surface + upper dermis | Deeper dermal regeneration |
Effect | Collagen stimulation | Tissue repair + anti-inflammatory |
Or more simply: Microneedling “activates” the skin, Rejuran “repairs” the skin
What skin concerns does each treat best?
Dermapen 4 Microneedling is ideal for:
Acne scars
Enlarged pores
Uneven texture
Dull skin
Mild fine lines
Because it stimulates collagen through controlled injury, it’s particularly effective for surface-level structural issues.
Rejuran is ideal for:
Thin, ageing skin
Under-eye concerns
Skin barrier damage
Redness and inflammation
Overall skin quality and elasticity
Because it works at a deeper level, it’s better suited to regeneration and repair.
Downtime and experience
Dermapen 4:
Redness for 1–3 days (like mild sunburn)
Slight sensitivity
Gradual improvement over weeks
Rejuran:
Small injection bumps for 24–72 hours
Mild swelling or bruising
Results build progressively over multiple sessions
Both treatments typically require a course of 3–4 sessions for optimal results.
Which one is better?
This is the wrong question.
They are not competing treatments—they do different jobs.
Microneedling improves structure and texture
Rejuran improves skin quality and repair
In fact, many advanced clinics now combine both approaches because they work synergistically.
Why combining them often gives the best results
When used together:
Microneedling creates channels and stimulates collagen
Rejuran enhances regeneration and healing
This combination can lead to:
faster recovery
improved skin quality
longer-lasting results
The Thrive approach
At Thrive, we don’t believe in one-size-fits-all treatments.
Instead, we design medical, personalised protocols that may include:
Microneedling (Dermapen 4) for stimulation
Rejuran for repair
Additional regenerative treatments for optimisation
Final takeaway
If you’re deciding between the two:
Choose microneedling if your main concern is texture, scarring, or pores
Choose Rejuran if your concern is ageing, thinning skin, or skin quality
Or, for the best outcome:
Combine both for a complete regenerative approach
Want to know what’s right for your skin?
A proper assessment is key. Your skin type, concerns, and goals will determine the most effective approach.


Comments